Skip to main content

Appellate Litigation

One of the best tax litigation boutiques in the country.
Chambers USA

OVERVIEW

Kostelanetz LLP maintains a robust appellate litigation practice in federal and state courts and in civil and criminal matters. 

Our attorneys’ extensive experience as both prosecutors and defense attorneys — representing the government and defendants in federal and state appeals — has established a strong foundation for our appellate litigation practice in tax and criminal matters and reinforced our firm’s equally vigorous representation of clients in civil appeals in the commercial arena.

Our attorneys are also regularly called upon by clients to write “friend of the court,” or amicus, briefs in support or opposition to higher court review of major cases involving complex tax, legal, and constitutional questions. 

Our arguments have proven persuasive. In the U.S. Supreme Court’s groundbreaking 2023 decision in the case of Alexandru Bittner v. United States (No. 21-1195), the Court adopted the position advocated by the American College of Tax Counsel (ACTC) in an amicus brief written filed by Kostelanetz attorneys. In doing so, the Court held that the penalty for a non-willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) applies on a per-report basis, and not on a per-account basis. 

Caroline Rule, a leader of the firm’s appellate litigation practice, began her legal career as a clerk to the Hon. John J. Gibbons, then-Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. She then undertook a two-year commitment to represent indigent state criminal defendants on appeal as a staff attorney at the Office of the Appellate Defender in Manhattan. 

Another leader in the firm’s appellate litigation practice is Andrew Weiner, who served as a trial attorney for over a decade with the U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division where he briefed and argued approximately 50 cases before the United States courts of appeals. At Kostelanetz, Andy has been instrumental in assisting clients wishing to file amicus briefs at the U.S. Supreme Court, federal appeals courts, and the U.S. Tax Court on complicated constitutional and procedural questions related to taxation and the tax code.

Additionally, Gray Proctor, of counsel in Kostelanetz’s Atlanta office, brings broad experience spanning many substantive areas of law, including criminal and postconviction matters.  He has maintained an appellate and trial support practice for over 13 years, and he has been recognized as a board-certified appellate expert in Florida since 2021. He also accepts appointed federal criminal defendants for the Eleventh Circuit. A veteran of disputes involving a broad range of substantive matters, he is admitted to practice in the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeal.

REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS

U.S. Supreme Court

  • In the U.S. Supreme Court case Alexandru Bittner v. United States (No. 21-1195), the court adopted, in its February 28, 2023 ruling, the position advocated by the American College of Tax Counsel (ACTC) in an amicus brief filed by Kostelanetz attorneys. The groundbreaking decision held that the penalty for a non-willful failure to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) applies on a per-report basis, and not on a per-account basis. 
  • Filed an amicus brief on behalf of Professors Reuven Avi-Yonah, Clinton Wallace, and Bret Wells in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Charles G. Moore v. United States (No. 22-800). The case involves a constitutional challenge to the transition tax under Section 965, but the implications are far-reaching. The brief asks the Supreme Court to affirm the decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the statute.
  • Filed an amicus brief on behalf of the American College of Tax Counsel (ACTC) on in the case of John Paul Salvador v. United States (No. 24-108). The issue in the case was whether a late tax return that is otherwise correctly prepared constitutes a “return” for purposes of Section 523(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and whether and under what circumstances debt from a late-filed return can be discharged in bankruptcy. The ACTC’s brief supported Salvador and urged the Supreme Court to adopt a clearer and more uniform definition of a “return” for debtors who’ve declared bankruptcy.

Federal and State Appeals Courts

  • Filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Center for Taxpayer Rights in the Eleventh Circuit in Hirsch v. Commissioner (Nos. 24-10420, 25-10426). The brief surveys the history of tax penalties from the dawn of America and concludes that the IRS Commissioner cannot constitutionally assess and collect penalties under IRC 6662 or 6663. Instead, Article III and the Seventh Amendment require the government to collect those penalties by suing the taxpayer in an Article III court that offers a jury trial.
  • Filed an amicus brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in a tax whistleblower case captioned In re Sealed Case, D.C. Circuit Case No. 24-1001.  Kostelanetz filed the amicus brief on behalf of another whistleblower in a pending U.S. Tax Court case, arguing that de novo review should apply in actions brought under the tax whistleblower statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7623(b). 
  • Serve as appellate counsel in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for a client who is appealing his wrongful conviction for a tax-related conspiracy and individual tax charges.
  • Filed a brief in New York’s highest tribunal, the New York Court of Appeals, as counsel to the New York Council of Defense Lawyers (NYCDL). In its decision in the case, People of the State of New York v. M. Robert Neulander, 34 N.Y.3d 110 (N.Y. 2019), the court unanimously endorsed the NYCDL’s position that a juror’s serious misconduct (including sending and receiving numerous text messages during deliberations and then lying about it) entitled the defendant to a new trial.
  • Filed a brief in the New York Court of Appeals in support of the New York Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC), on behalf of entities and individuals including the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce and individual physicians, in the case of Greater New York Taxi Assoc. v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Comm’n, 25 N.Y.3d 600 (N.Y. 2015). New York State’s highest court unanimously agreed with the position taken in the Kostelanetz brief, that the TLC had authority to require nearly all taxi medallion holders to purchase a single safer taxi vehicle.
  • Authored briefs in support of Kostelanetz clients’ appeals to the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, to overturn decisions by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board concerning the New York State Department of Labor determinations regarding New York State Unemployment Taxes (SUTA). The case is pending.
  • Secured dismissal in the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, of a putative class action brought by grocery stores against our not-for-profit clients, Public Health Solutions (PHS) and Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital.
  • Defeated multiple “Article 78” petitions challenging zoning variances granted to a Manhattan synagogue, on appeal to the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
  • Defended a lawyer, sued in his individual capacity by Metropolitan Commercial Bank, when the bank appealed to New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, from the trial court’s denial of summary judgment to the bank, filing a cross-appeal and winning the dismissal of all claims against the client.

OUR PEOPLE

Kostelanetz LLP attorneys are highly skilled lawyers with decades of administrative and litigation experience.